MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614904870 · doi:10.1002/mats.201300137

Copolymer Composition Deviations from Mayo–Lewis Conventional Free Radical Behavior in Nitroxide Mediated Copolymerization

2014· article· en· W2614904870 on OpenAlex
Iván Zapata‐González, Robin A. Hutchinson, Krzysztof Matyjaszewski, Enrique Saldívar‐Guerra, José Ortiz‐Cisneros

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Theory and Simulations · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerNitroxide mediated radical polymerizationReactivity (psychology)Polymer chemistryComposition (language)ChemistryOrganic chemistryRadical polymerizationPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The validity of the Mayo‐Lewis (ML) terminal model for copolymer composition in nitroxide mediated copolymerization is systematically tested by simulation. Significant deviations in copolymer composition from ML behavior occur under various parameter combinations before the nitroxide quasi‐equilibrium condition (QEC) is reached. Maximum deviations are usually below 5 pp, and absent at conversions higher than 3%, but after 10% in some cases. High reactivity ratios lead to larger deviations; low reactivity ratios (faster cross‐propagation) produce near ML behavior. An additional continuous radical source leads to faster attainment of the QEC and reduces the deviations from ML behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it