MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614907801 · doi:10.2118/185514-ms

Data-Driven Model Reduction Based on Sparsity-Promoting Methods for Multiphase Flow in Porous Media

2017· article· en· W2614907801 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQatar National Research FundCMG Reservoir Simulation FoundationQatar Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceSnapshot (computer storage)Reservoir simulationReduction (mathematics)AlgorithmMultiphase flowDynamic mode decompositionProper orthogonal decompositionSparse matrixMatrix (chemical analysis)Matrix decompositionData miningMathematical optimizationMachine learningMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fast simulation algorithms based on reduced-order modeling have been developed in order to facilitate large-scale and complex computationally intensive reservoir simulation and optimization. Methods like proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) have been successfully used to efficiently capture and predict the behavior of reservoir fluid flow. Non-intrusive techniques (e.g., DMD), are especially attractive as it is a data-driven approach that do not require code modifications (equation free). In this paper, we will further enhance the application of the DMD, by investigating sparse approximations of the snapshots. This is particularly useful when there is a limited number of sparse measurements as in the case of reservoir simulation. The approach taken here is the snapshot-based model reduction, whereby one computes a sequence of reservoir simulation solutions (e.g., pressures and water saturations in the case of two-phase flow model) forming a big data matrix – we call this the offline step - that is used to compute basis for representing the states of the system for different input parameters – the online step. The selection of these few basis is the core of the model reduction methods. DMD selects the basis and apply the reduction without knowledge of the inner works of the reservoir simulator, as opposed to the POD methods. Sparse DMD has been introduced recently to determine the subset of the DMD models that has the most profound influence on the quality of the approximation of the snapshot sequence. Two model reduction process are involved. One is offline process, which does not require running the simulator but rather predicting future behavior with linear combination of DMD modes. The other online process incorporates sparsity DMD modes in numerical simulator to release the burden of linear matrix solver. We first show the methodology applied to a 3-D single phase flow problem. Here we show the DMD modes and its physical interpretations, and then move to two phase flow for 2-D heterogeneous reservoir using the SPE-10 benchmark. Both online and offline process will be used for evaluation. We observe that with a few DMD modes we can capture the behavior of the reservoir models. Sparse DMD leads to the optimal selection of the few DMD modes. We also assess the trade-offs between problem size and computational time for each reservoir model. The novelty of our method is the application of sparse DMD, which is a data-driven technique and the ability to select few optimal basis for the case of reservoir simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it