MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2614916797 · doi:10.5006/c2014-4254

Methodology for Accelerated Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion in under Deposits from Crude Oil Transmission Pipelines

2014· article· en· W2614916797 on OpenAlexaff
Winston Mosher, Michael Mosher, Andrew Oliver, Tony Lam, Haralampos Tsaprailis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsAlberta Innovates
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionPipeline transportCrude oilPetroleum engineeringMetallurgyEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceGeologyEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The current study presents the progress made in developing a protocol for accelerated microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) in under deposits for crude oil transmission pipelines. The methodology incorporates nutrient-rich broths for the cultivation of naturally occurring bacteria obtained from sludge samples and the formation of an active biofilm on the surface of carbon steel metal specimens. The biofilm is then overlain with sludge, exposed to crude oil and an under deposit environment is formed. Using this approach, corrosion rates in excess of 1.5 mm/y have been duplicated with evidence of pitting; more importantly, laboratory testing has shown that these corrosion rates could be decreased with the addition of a biocide and proprietary chemical package injection. Moreover, pilot scale experiments were conducted by forming the biofilm/under deposit environment on the surface of a corrosion probe that was recessed within an oil flow loop. The pilot scale flow loop evaluation showed that the addition of proprietary chemical package alone could dramatically decrease the overall corrosion rate by 83 % within hours and by 95 % in days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207