PRIMEIRA DESCRIÇÃO DA ATIVIDADE PREDATÓRIA DE MACROBRACHIUM PANTANALENSE, MACROBRACHIUM AMAZONICUM, MACROBRACHIUM BRASILIENSE E TRICHODACTYLUS PETROPOLITANUS CONTRA LARVAS DE AEDES AEGYPTI, ANOPHELES DARLING E CULEX QUINQUEFASCIATUS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The culicides acts in transmission of serious diseases to humans. The objective of this study was to report the predatory activity of Macrobrachium pantanalense, Macrobrachium amazonicum, Macrobrachium brasiliense and Trichodactylus petropolitanus on Aedes aegypti, Anopheles darling and Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. These larvae were placed in aquarium with shrimps, crabs and, the predatory activity was evaluated by visual inspection for 24 hours. Was observed that 100% of the larvae were consumed within two minutes. An unprecedented event reported in this study was the observation of predation of the larvae of A. aegypti, An. darling and C. quinquefasciatus for crabs of species T. petropolitanus. These same species of crustaceans were released in water bodies with the presence of larvae of these insects. In just 48 hours where not collected new larvae in the release sites of shrimps and crabs. The incidence of mosquitoes adults caught in traps
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".