MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615167375 · doi:10.2118/185500-ms

Green Fracturing Technology of Shale Gas: LPG Waterless Fracturing Technology and its Feasibility in China

2017· article· en· W2615167375 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fengming Jin, C. Chen, M. Kedi

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringFracturing fluidOil shaleLiquefied petroleum gasHydraulic fracturingShale gasSurface tensionEnhanced oil recoveryGeologyEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As a kind of water saving and green fracturing methodology, the innovative LPG fracturing fluid system that is developed by Gasfrac is known for its low density, viscosity and surface tension, making satisfying achievements in McCully Gasfield in Canada. However, it has not been applied by scale in China and requires further analysis. The LPG fracturing technology was analyzed technically and its physical properties were studied, including viscosities and surface tensions of water, butane and propane within various temperature ranges. A LPG fracturing phase control diagram and a fluid capillary pressure diagram were drafted. Production data of many shale gas wells in McCully block were analyzed to accomplish the fracturing flowback formula. The economical analysis of the LPG fracturing technology was completed, including the overall cost of slickwater fracturing fluid and water treatment, as well as the overall cost of LPG fracturing fluid and its integrated devices. The slickwater fracturing fluid has been widely used in China to exploit shale gas, which wastes a lot of water and does harm to environment. The LPG fracturing technology utilizes liquefied petroleum gas as the fracturing fluid that mainly consists of propane with ethane, butane, propylene and some additives, so it is harmless to formation. Compared with conventional hydraulic fracturing, the LPG fracturing fluid is mixed with chemical additives when being pumped and it becomes a kind of viscous fluid like gel, so that proppant particles may be evenly distributed in it and they don't deposit along fractures. Besides, fractures are higher and the production life of gas wells is improved. Propane mixes with natural gas completely and it may reduce the oil's viscosity after contacting it. Therefore, there is no need of flowback and water treatment procedure. Injected in a closed loop, the LPG fracturing fluid is operated via a remote computer and monitored by sensors distributed in the operation area, so that LPG leakage risk is reduced and the fracturing operation may be carried out safely. Shale gas is being widely exploited in Sichuan Province, which is located at the source of Yangtze River. In Ordos Basin limited water sources make it very costly to prepare conventional fracturing fluids. The slickwater fracturing fluid is cheaper than the LPG fracturing fluid, while water treatment costs more. All in all, LPG fracturing technology shall be recommended in China that suffers from severe environmental risks and water scarcity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering ConferenceSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207