MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615169585 · doi:10.1161/res.111.suppl_1.a255

Abstract 255: A Normokalemic Nondepolarizing Cardioplegia Minimizes Myocardial Injury and Improves Cardiac Function in a Large Animal Model of Donation After Cardiocirculatory Death

2012· article· en· W2615169585 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher W. White, Ayyaz Ali, Bo Xiang, Simon Colah, Paul Mundt, Rakesh C. Arora, Trevor Lee, Steven J. Large, Ganghong Tian, Darren H. Freed

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Institute for BiodiagnosticsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEx vivoTransplantationAnesthesiaPerfusionCardiac function curveCardiologyIschemiaInternal medicineIn vivoHeart failureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Procurement of donor hearts is typically preceded by delivery of a cold hyperkalemic cardioplegia (CP) that achieves arrest by depolarization of the membrane potential. This method has no intrinsic cardioprotective properties and may exacerbate ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. A tepid adenosine-lidocaine (AL) non-depolarizing CP has been shown to limit IR injury and improve myocardial functional recovery in a small animal model of orthotopic heart transplantation. We sought to determine the impact of AL CP on myocardial injury and function, in a porcine model of donation after cardio-circulatory death (DCD). Methods: Female Yorkshire pigs (60 kg) were subjected to a hypoxic cardiac arrest. Following a 15-minute standoff period donor hearts were procured, resuscitated ex-vivo, and transplanted into a recipient animal. Hearts in group 1 (N=7) were protected with a cold blood-Plegisol CP, perfused with a blood-crystalloid solution during ex-vivo assessment, and arrested with a cold blood-Plegisol CP prior to transplantation. Hearts in group 2 (N=5) were protected with a tepid AL-STEEN CP and perfused with a blood-STEEN solution in a continuous fashion during ex-vivo assessment and transplantation. Results: Animals in group 2 had a significantly longer ex-vivo perfusion time compared to those in group 1 (174±29 vs. 135±45 min, p<0.05), yet they demonstrated significantly less weight gain (14±4 vs. 25±8 grams/hour, p<0.05). Further, animals in group 2 exhibited less troponin I release during ex-vivo perfusion and had significantly better diastolic function following wean from cardiopulmonary bypass (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure volume relationship 0.115±0.052 vs. 0.508±0.223, p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in level of calpain activity between groups (171.3±68.6 vs. 140.12±50.6, p=0.36). Conclusion: A tepid non-depolarizing AL CP results in less myocardial edema during ex-vivo perfusion, minimizes myocardial injury, and improves diastolic function following transplantation of DCD hearts, but fails to eliminate the activation of calcium-dependent proteases. Further studies should investigate if a calpain inhibitor delivered at reperfusion could further minimize IR injury in DCD hearts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation ResearchSame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207