Abstract 255: A Normokalemic Nondepolarizing Cardioplegia Minimizes Myocardial Injury and Improves Cardiac Function in a Large Animal Model of Donation After Cardiocirculatory Death
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Procurement of donor hearts is typically preceded by delivery of a cold hyperkalemic cardioplegia (CP) that achieves arrest by depolarization of the membrane potential. This method has no intrinsic cardioprotective properties and may exacerbate ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. A tepid adenosine-lidocaine (AL) non-depolarizing CP has been shown to limit IR injury and improve myocardial functional recovery in a small animal model of orthotopic heart transplantation. We sought to determine the impact of AL CP on myocardial injury and function, in a porcine model of donation after cardio-circulatory death (DCD). Methods: Female Yorkshire pigs (60 kg) were subjected to a hypoxic cardiac arrest. Following a 15-minute standoff period donor hearts were procured, resuscitated ex-vivo, and transplanted into a recipient animal. Hearts in group 1 (N=7) were protected with a cold blood-Plegisol CP, perfused with a blood-crystalloid solution during ex-vivo assessment, and arrested with a cold blood-Plegisol CP prior to transplantation. Hearts in group 2 (N=5) were protected with a tepid AL-STEEN CP and perfused with a blood-STEEN solution in a continuous fashion during ex-vivo assessment and transplantation. Results: Animals in group 2 had a significantly longer ex-vivo perfusion time compared to those in group 1 (174±29 vs. 135±45 min, p<0.05), yet they demonstrated significantly less weight gain (14±4 vs. 25±8 grams/hour, p<0.05). Further, animals in group 2 exhibited less troponin I release during ex-vivo perfusion and had significantly better diastolic function following wean from cardiopulmonary bypass (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure volume relationship 0.115±0.052 vs. 0.508±0.223, p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in level of calpain activity between groups (171.3±68.6 vs. 140.12±50.6, p=0.36). Conclusion: A tepid non-depolarizing AL CP results in less myocardial edema during ex-vivo perfusion, minimizes myocardial injury, and improves diastolic function following transplantation of DCD hearts, but fails to eliminate the activation of calcium-dependent proteases. Further studies should investigate if a calpain inhibitor delivered at reperfusion could further minimize IR injury in DCD hearts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".