MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615187459 · doi:10.1504/ijrm.2017.084152

Pricing of excess inventory on Groupon

2017· article· en· W2615187459 on OpenAlex
Kyle D. S. Maclean, John G. Wilson, Srini Krishnamoorthy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Revenue Management · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessInventory managementOrder (exchange)MicroeconomicsIndustrial organizationEconomicsOperations managementFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem faced by a business that is considering using the Groupon platform to sell excess inventory. We discuss how demand functions can be derived using management knowledge. Then, using a single period model where excess inventory is exogenous, we show that the decision to use Groupon and the price to set on that channel depend on two parameters: the relative price sensitivity of Groupon customers as compared to the retailer's regular customers and the relative size of the Groupon market as compared to the regular market. Under a two-period model, when initial inventory is a decision, we show optimal inventory quantities. Our two-period model suggests that managers may plan on using Groupon and order inventory accordingly. We discuss the implications on third party channels as well as retail managers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it