Large-scale data-driven integrative framework for extracting essential targets and processes from disease-associated gene data sets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Populations worldwide currently face several public health challenges, including growing prevalence of infections and the emergence of new pathogenic organisms. The cost and risk associated with drug development make the development of new drugs for several diseases, especially orphan or rare diseases, unappealing to the pharmaceutical industry. Proof of drug safety and efficacy is required before market approval, and rigorous testing makes the drug development process slow, expensive and frequently result in failure. This failure is often because of the use of irrelevant targets identified in the early steps of the drug discovery process, suggesting that target identification and validation are cornerstones for the success of drug discovery and development. Here, we present a large-scale data-driven integrative computational framework to extract essential targets and processes from an existing disease-associated data set and enhance target selection by leveraging drug-target-disease association at the systems level. We applied this framework to tuberculosis and Ebola virus diseases combining heterogeneous data from multiple sources, including protein-protein functional interaction, functional annotation and pharmaceutical data sets. Results obtained demonstrate the effectiveness of the pipeline, leading to the extraction of essential drug targets and to the rational use of existing approved drugs. This provides an opportunity to move toward optimal target-based strategies for screening available drugs and for drug discovery. There is potential for this model to bridge the gap in the production of orphan disease therapies, offering a systematic approach to predict new uses for existing drugs, thereby harnessing their full therapeutic potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".