MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615234330 · doi:10.29103/tj.v3i1.44

PENGARUH TATAGUNA LAHAN TERHADAP BESARAN BANJIR DAN SEDIMEN DAS KRUENG KEUREUTO ACEH UTARA

2016· article· id· W2615234330 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTeras Jurnal Jurnal Teknik Sipil · 2016
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimedia Learning Systems
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian banjir dan sedimen Sungai Krueng (Kr) Keureuto dilakukan untuk mengetahui pengaruh perubahan data guna lahan dan perilaku sedimen. Lingkup penulisan meliputi pengumpulan data sedimen, peta daerah aliran sungai (DAS), data curah hujan, penentuan curah hujan dan debit banjir rencana, analisa sedimen DAS dan perhitungan produksi sedimen akibat banjir. Metode yang digunakan dalam analisa hidrologi adalah metode momen. Hasil analisa menunjukkan bahwa data hujan cenderung mengikuti distribusi harga ekstrim (extreme value), sedangkan hubungan cerah hujan dan debit banjir rencana menunjukkan hubungan logaritmik. Hubungan linear diperoleh untuk korelasi antara besarnya debit banjir dan debit sedimen. Hasil penelitian ini sangat bermanfaat untuk program penanggulangan banjir Sungai Krueng Keureuto.Kata kunci: banjir, sedimen, momen statistik

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it