MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615422945 · doi:10.4000/cem.5492

CBMA - Chartae Burgundiae Medii Aevi. II. Cartulaires, éditions, base de données

2010· article· fr· W2615422945 on OpenAlexaff
Eliana Magnani, Marie-José Gasse-Grandjean

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin du Centre d’études médiévales d’Auxerre · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Archaeological Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Bulletin of Medical History
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBase (topology)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La deuxime journe d'tudes du programme CBMA -Chartae Burgundiae Medii Aevi s'est articule autour de trois questions : les applications pour l'interrogation raisonne du corpus d'actes dits numriss, la recherche applique sur ce corpus et l'tude critique des ditions, des cartulaires et des fonds diplomatiques bourguignons. Conscients que l'accs la documentation numrise, qui se gnralise actuellement sur Internet, doit s'accompagner d'une rflexion pistmologique, ce programme a pour vocation le dveloppement d'outils propres transformer et faire avancer nos pratiques de recherche.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin du Centre d’études médiévales d’AuxerreSame topicHistorical and Archaeological StudiesFrench-language works237,207