DOB-Based Neural Control of Flexible Hypersonic Flight Vehicle Considering Wind Effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the disturbance observer (DOB)-based neural adaptive control on the longitudinal dynamics of a flexible hypersonic flight vehicle (HFV) in the presence of wind effects. The coupling effect between flexible states and rigid body, and the accessional angle of attack (AOA) due to wind, is modeled as unknown disturbance, where the nonlinear DOB is constructed using the neural approximation. For the weight update in neural networks (NNs), a novel algorithm is proposed with the additional prediction error derived from the serial-parallel estimation model (SPEM) using both neural approximation and disturbance estimation. Different from previous work, the wind effect is taken into the hypersonic flight dynamics for realistic analysis, and the novel controller is designed using compound estimation, where the NN and the DOB are constructed to deal with aerodynamic uncertainty and unknown disturbance. Simulation studies of a flexible HFV with wind effects show that the proposed controller can achieve high tracking accuracy, while the compound estimation can closely follow the system uncertainty with fast convergence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".