MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615544448 · doi:10.25134/unifikasi.v4i1.477

PENGARUH KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM KONSERVASI SUMBER DAYA AIR TERHADAP KESADARAN LINGKUNGAN MASYARAKAT KABUPATEN KUNINGAN

2017· article· en· W2615544448 on OpenAlexaff
Suwari Akhmaddhian

Bibliographic record

VenueUNIFIKASI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
FundersAustralian Agency for International Development
KeywordsLocal governmentBusinessGovernment (linguistics)GeographyEnvironmental planningPolitical sciencePublic administration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractPublic awareness of the importance of a healthy and good environment continues to grow. The formulation of the problem is how the influence of government policy in conserving water resources on environmental awareness of the community in kuningan regency. The purpose of this research is to know how the influence of government policy in conserving water resources to environmental awareness of community in kuningan regency. This research can be practical and theoretical. The research method used by the researcher is using empirical juridical approach. Result of research The policy of local government in conserving water resources contained in Local Regulation of Regency of Kuningan Number 12 Year 2007 about Conservation of Water Resources to arrange society in the direction as desired by government of this blood start proved with existence of society awareness in environmental conservation that is with angry Community of kuningan district with logging tree in cilimus market. The conclusion of local government policy in conservation of water resources has been effective to increase public awareness in environmental conservation. Recommendations to increase awareness of the community hence the innovations needed to increase the awareness of the community through hygiene contests both at the sub-district or village level and explore the potential for increased environmental awareness through the excavation of local wisdom.Keywords: Influence, Policy, Environmental Awareness.Abstrak Kesadaradaran masyarakat akan pentingnya lingkungan hidup yang sehat dan baik terus berkembang. Adapun rumusan masalah adalah bagaimana pengaruh kebijakan pemerintah dalam konservasi sumber daya air terhadap kesadaran lingkungan masyarakat di kabupaten kuningan. Adapun tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaruh kebijakan pemerintah dalam konservasi sumber daya air terhadap kesadaran lingkungan masyarakat di kabupaten kuningan. Penelitian ini dapat berguna secara praktis dan teoritis. Metode penelitian yang digunakan oleh peneliti adalah menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian Kebijakan pemerintah daerah dalam konservasi sumber daya air tertuang dalam Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Kuningan Nomor 12 Tahun 2007 tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Air untuk mengatur masyarakat ke arah seperti yang diinginkan oleh pemerintah darah ini mulai terbukti dengan adanya kepedulian masyarakat dalam pelestarian lingkungan hidup yaitu dengan marahnya masyarakat kabupaten kuningan dengan penebangan pohon yang berada di pasar cilimus. Kesimpulan kebijakan pemerintah daerah dalam konservasi sumber daya air sudah efektif untuk meningkakan kesadaran masyarakat dalam pelestarian lingkungan hidup. Rekomendasi untuk meningkatkan kesadaram masyarakat maka diperlukan inovasi-inovasi untuk peningkatan kesadaran masyarakat tersebut melalui lomba-lomba kebersihan baik di tingkat kecamatan ataupun desa dan menggali potensi-potensi peningkatan kesadaran lingkungan melalui penggalian kearifan lokal.Kata kunci : Pengaruh, Kebijakan , Kesadaran Lingkungan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNIFIKASI Jurnal Ilmu HukumSame topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207