MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615561217 · doi:10.1680/jensu.15.00059

Towards the development of eco-industrial estates in Bhutan

2017· article· en· W2615561217 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sonam Wangdi, Madhav Prasad Nepal

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Industrial Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationBusinessGovernment (linguistics)EstateIndustrial parkPrivate sectorEnvironmental planningSecondary sector of the economyEnvironmental resource managementEconomic growthEconomyGeographyEconomicsPolitical scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the potential of applying industrial ecology in the development of eco-industrial estates in Bhutan. It presents the factors contributing to the success or failure of eco-industrial estates along with the benefits arising from the set-up of such facilities to industry, the environment and local communities. The development strategies, policies, practices, laws, rules and regulations, market conditions and private-sector initiatives undertaken in Kalundborg Eco-industrial Park, Burnside Eco-industrial Park and Map Ta Phut Industrial Estate in Denmark, Canada and Thailand, respectively, are used to analyse eco-industrial development in Bhutan. The existence of supportive legislation, a close working relationship between the government and private sector, enabling an environment for information sharing, and a diverse mix of industries in Bhutan are identified as the key opportunities and supportive conditions for as well as the challenges to eco-industrial development in Bhutan and realisation of the government’s vision for a ‘cleaner’ industrial sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering SustainabilitySame topicSustainable Industrial EcologyFrench-language works237,207