MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615610109 · doi:10.3917/etan.692.0135

Decolonizing Performance Research

2016· article· fr· W2615610109 on OpenAlexaff
Virginie Magnat

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes anglaises · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSociologyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article étudie les potentialités et les limites du paradigme anglo-américain de la performance. Il analyse les implications épistémologiques et méthodologiques du “performance turn” en sciences sociales, et prend en compte la critique que font les chercheurs indigènes des systèmes de connaissance occidentaux qui privilégient, marque d’impérialisme culturel, la pensée binaire et le dualisme entre l’ esprit et le corps . L’insistance sur la dimension politique fait écho aux concepts d’archive et de répertoire, de traces matérielles et de performance non-écrite, tels qu’ils sont définis par Diana Taylor, montrant les présupposés sociaux et culturels à l’œuvre derrière l’apparente neutralité de l’archive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes anglaisesSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207