MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615685849

Les intellectuels doivent se réapproprier l’espace médiatique

2017· article· pt· W2615685849 on OpenAlexaff
Raymond Corriveau

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Eletrônica Internacional de Economia Política da Informação da Comunicação e da Cultura c · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’espace mediatique demeure un chemin privilegie de l’acces a l’espace public. Les critiques ont demontre une forte colonisation de ce champ aux logiques du marche. Cela entrave l’expression des intellectuels qui y œuvrent. C’est sur l’intellectuel hors de ce champ que repose le fardeau d’alimenter differemment l’espace mediatique. Mais la critique doit aussi prendre le champ mediatique comme objet. Sans quoi, l’espace mediatique constituera toujours une entrave. Cette problematique prendra une grande acuite sur des questions vitales comme l’avenir climatique de la planete. La dependance des medias au monde publicitaire rendra cette entrave encore plus epineuse

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.021
Scholarly communication0.0230.022
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.202
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Eletrônica Internacional de Economia Política da Informação da Comunicação e da Cultura cSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207