Geant4 Simulations for the Radon Electric Dipole Moment Search at TRIUMF
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The existence of a permanent electric dipole moment (EDM) requires the violation of time-reversal symmetry (T) or, equivalently, the violation of charge conjugation C and parity P (CP). Although no particle EDM has yet been found, current theories beyond the Standard Model, e.g. multiple-Higgs theories, left-right symmetry, and supersymmetry (SUSY), generally predict EDMs within current experimental reach. In fact, present limits on the EDMs of the neutron, electron and 199Hg atom have significantly reduced the parameter spaces of these models. The measurement of a non-zero EDM would be the first direct measurement of a violation of time-reversal symmetry, and it would represent a clear signal of CP violation from physics beyond the Standard Model. The search for an EDM with radon has an enticing feature. Recent theoretical calculations predict substantial enhancements in the atomic EDMs for atoms with octupole-deformed nuclei, making odd-A Rn isotopes prime candidates for the EDM search. Such measurements require extensive development work and simulation studies. The Geant4 simulations presented here are an essential aspect of these developments. They provide an accurate description of [gamma]-ray scattering and backgrounds in the experimental apparatus and [gamma]-ray detectors, and are being used to study the overall sensitivity of the RnEDM experiment at TRIUMF in Vancouver, B.C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".