La decolonialidad del saber en los discursos indígenas quebequenses: los casos del historiador Georges Sioui y la poeta Rita Mestokosho
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the colonization of the Americas, the Europeans introduced coloniality, imposing political and epistemic control structures. Today, an epistemic mobilization, coming from Aboriginal people themselves and academics, is taking place to dislocate the coloniality. To understand some of the dynamics involved in their political and identity affirmation, the author examines the discursive dimension of this epistemic mobilization through the concept of heterogeneity as developed by the Peruvian literary critic Antonio Cornejo Polar, some of the proposals of Latin American colonial and «decolonial» studies and the ontological turn in anthropology. Subsequently, these theories are applied to two Quebec’s indigenous authors, the historian Georges Sioui and the poetess Rita Mestokosho, and show how they manifests decolonizing border thinking through various devices such as border gnosis, others thought and other languages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".