Two Dimensional Modeling to Simulate Stormwater Flows at Photovoltaic Solar Energy Sites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solar farms (sometimes known as solar parks or solar fields) are the large scale use of photovoltaic (PV) solar panels to generate green, clean electricity at scale, usually to feed into the grid. Solar farms can cover anything between 1 acre (0.40 ha) and several hundred acres (120+ ha), and are usually developed in rural areas. Solar farms consist of arrays of ground mounted rectangular panels that are sloped toward the sun at either fixed or adjustable angles. Amec Foster Wheeler assessed several candidate solar farm sites in Texas for stormwater flooding hazard and designed the stormwater management system for a site in Georgia using two-dimensional (2D) hydrologic and hydraulic (H&H) models to simulate the infiltration and overland flow. The FLO-2D software package was used to develop a rectangular grid for runoff calculation. The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) method and the shallow water equations were used to route stormwater runoff across FLO-2D grids. Results were exported to ArcGIS for the creation of maps that displayed maximum velocities and flow depths for different storm events. Input data required for the development of the models was obtained from publicly available sources including U.S.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it