MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615859282

Classification algorithms for virtual metrology

2014· article· en· W2615859282 on OpenAlexaff
Shaima Tilouche, Samuel Bassetto, Vahid Partovi Nia

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers du GERAD · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsGroup for Research in Decision AnalysisPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetrologyComputer scienceAlgorithmProcess (computing)Sampling (signal processing)Dimensional metrologyQuality (philosophy)Measurement uncertaintyData miningMathematicsComputer visionStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Virtual metrology in quality control deals with drifts in product quality that occur during non-sampling periods. This approach enables a hundred percent control and improves the precision of statistical control, specially while there is no sampling activity in manufacturing process. The main challenge in virtual metrology is inaccurate predictions. As such, the choice of an appropriate algorithm for prediction is crucial. We compare several algorithms that can be used for prediction in virtual metrology. The comparison over different prediction algorithms is made on a simulated data inspired from virtual metrology application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers du GERADSame topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207