MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615868904

Power and Meaning Making in an EAP Classroom: Engaging with the Everyday

2016· book-chapter· en· W2615868904 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaoxiao Du

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative and international education · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyPedagogyMeaning (existential)Context (archaeology)English for academic purposesAgency (philosophy)PsychologySocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chun, C. W. (2015). Power and Meaning Making in an EAP Classroom: Engaging with the Everyday. North York, ON: University of Toronto Press. 219 pp. ISBN-13:978-1-78309-293-2Chun's book contributes to the existing literature regarding English for Academic Purpose (EAP) learning and teaching as well as it provides insights about critical literacy pedagogy in teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL). His book presents an in-depth analysis of an EAP classroom with a focus on how the participating EAP instructor incorporated functional grammar and critical literacy into her classes to further engage students' meaning making. Chun presents and discusses important topics including neoliberalism, globalization, consumer culture, multiculturalism, power, identity, praxis, subjectivity, reflexivity, agency, student engagement, language learning and teaching, as well as teachers' professional development.This book is organized into eight, interconnected chapters. The first chapter provides the background information, the rational for conducting this particular ethnographic study, and Chun's positionality within the research project. Chun also helps readers to understand the EAP program beyond the local context by bringing in the current debate. He also points to new directions for EAP programs, which facilitates the need for background information to continue to read the book.The second chapter takes readers to the EAP classroom where the language and literacies meaning making takes place between the participating EAP instructor and her students in a specific program within a particular institution culture in North America. Chun vividly presents the physical space of the EAP classroom by including classroom pictures. He then he goes beyond the obvious tables and chairs to explore the class rules. These class rules were written by the participating class and posted next to the board with English words, numbers, and drawings for the teacher and students to see on a daily basis. Chun goes deeper to reconceptualise the class text, which goes beyond the physical place, classroom furniture, and class rules and includes the following questions: Who are the participants in the classroom discourses? What are the complex relationships and dynamics among the participants? and How can the dynamics affect and (re)produce different classroom discourses?The third chapter discusses the meaning making process through analyzing a Reading Subject Position event in the spring term of the EAP class. Chun uses the detailed classroom recordings and dialogue from the teaching and learning process to help readers understand the participating teacher's teaching practices. The analysis of the specific methods used by the participating teacher helps readers to further understand the rationale of the research to introduce the topics of systemic foundational linguistics and functional grammar. The discussions of the EAP classroom practices also prepares readers for the critical discussions of the evolving classroom practices, presented later in the book.The fourth chapter examines the multimodalities used in an EAP classroom, focusing on neoliberal globalization discourses in YouTube videos. The fifth chapter continues the conversations of neoliberalization discourse focusing on summer term classes. The sixth chapter explores critical literacy in relation to the topic of modal minority consumer and multiculturalism in Canada using a particular text from the participating EAP classroom. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.016
Scholarly communication0.0110.011
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative and international educationSame topicSecond Language Learning and TeachingFrench-language works237,207