MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615931486 · doi:10.1109/ceit.2016.7929118

A Novel Kernelized Face Recognition System

2016· article· en· W2615931486 on OpenAlexaff
Arbia Soula, Salma Ben Saïd, Riadh Ksantini, Zied Lachiri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceFacial recognition systemComputer scienceKernel Fisher discriminant analysisLinear discriminant analysisSupport vector machineRobustness (evolution)Feature extractionFeature vectorClassifier (UML)Kernel (algebra)BiometricsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Face recognition is a quintessential biometric technique. It still remains challenging to accurately characterize the identity related features in face images. In this paper, we propose a novel classification method based on Kernel Fisher Discriminant Analysis using the distinctiveness of Gabor features and the robustness of ordinal measures. These parameters are derived from magnitude, phase, real and imaginary responses of Gabor filtering, respectively, and then are combined as visual primitive in local regions. The statistical distribution of these primitives in face image blocks are concatenated to obtain a feature vector whose dimension is reduced using PCA and variance. Finally, each feature vector is considered as a feature input for the proposed Multi-Class KFD classifier based on RBF Kernel. The proposed method is tested on the well-known ORL face database and the Yale face database. Then, it is evaluated and compared with linear classifier (LDA) in term of classification accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207