MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2615957833

Constitutionalism in the Netherlands and South Africa : A Comparative Study, G.N. Barrie : boekbespreking

2008· article· af· W2615957833 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. van der Schyff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg · 2008
Typearticle
Languageaf
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionalismLawGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceRule of lawHistoryDemocracyPhilosophyPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three years before the outbreak of World War II the eminent American historian McIlwain wrote that the one great issue that overshadowed the world at that time was the issue between constitutionalism and arbitrary government. The big question, he said, was whether rule by law or rule by arbitrary will would become the characteristic of governments (Constitutionalism and the Changing World (1939) 267). After Hitler's defeat he wrote that the principle of constitutionalism was being questioned as never before. He wrote that the world was trembling in the balance between the ordinary procedure of law and the processes of force which seemed so much quicker and effective (Constitutionalism (1947) 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse RegSame topicComparative and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207