MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616001542 · doi:10.17666/329410/2017

CONTRADIÇÕES DO TRABALHO NO BRASIL ATUAL: Terceirização, correspondentes bancários e a Justiça do Trabalho

2017· article· pt· W2616001542 on OpenAlexaff
Alisson Droppa, Magda Barros Biavaschi, Bárbara Vallejos Vazquez

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Economy and Work Transformation
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceBusinessWork (physics)LegislaturePublic administrationWelfare economicsPublic relationsLawEconomicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo discute os correspondentes bancários como forma burlada de terceirização, em um cenário de transformações do mundo do trabalho contemporâneo. Essa forma de contratar a mão de obra de terceiros para realização de serviços próprios de bancários apresentou aumento significativo no Brasil nos últimos anos. O artigo analisa as principais tendências das decisões da Justiça do Trabalho em demandas envolvendo esses trabalhadores, aprofundando estudos anteriores sobre o papel das instituições públicas diante da terceirização, tendo como fonte prevalente Acórdãos do Tribunal Superior do Trabalho.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Brasileira de Ciências SociaisSame topicDigital Economy and Work TransformationFrench-language works237,207