MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616046386

In Post-Human Praise of the Humanities

2009· article· fr· W2616046386 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean-Paul Engélibert

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de littérature comparée · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanityPraisePower (physics)CurseCreaturesMythologyArtSociologyAestheticsHumanitiesArt historyLiteraturePhilosophyHistoryAnthropologyTheologyNatural (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The novel by the Canadian writer Margaret Atwood Oryx and Crake (2003) continues a reflection on the post-human started nearly a century ago by Karel Capek in R.U.R. The Crakers, an artificial post-human species, live in prelapsarian happiness following the near-extinction of humanity, unaware of paternity and of the curse that, according to their creator, it generates. Their inventor thus implemented an essential trend of the 20th century by inscribing in his creatures the modern harassment of the paternal function that psychoanalysis so effectively described. However, the irony in the novel lies in how it shows that his creatures escape his power by inventing myths and rituals that will put an Other in their lives as a symbolic mark, the authority of which enables them to free themselves from their condition. Oryx and Crake thus contrasts the humanities and their aims as well as knowledge and liberation to technology and its fortunately fallible power of subjection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de littérature comparéeSame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207