MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616050841 · doi:10.1109/wocc.2017.7928971

Distributed big data management in smart grid

2017· article· en· W2616050841 on OpenAlexafffund
Umar Ahsan, Abdul Bais

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersSaskPower
KeywordsSmart gridComputer scienceAutomationDistributed computingKey (lock)Big dataGridData processingProcess (computing)Embedded systemDistributed generationDatabaseEngineeringRenewable energyOperating systemElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart grid is a technological advancement to the traditional power system that provides efficient and reliable utilization of energy resources. Large number of sensors are becoming part of the power network to improve its efficiency. These sensors enable communication between home appliances and power generators to enhance home appliance automation, monitoring and remote control capabilities. As smart power grid incorporates a large number of data-generating embedded sensors; key questions are where in the network to process and analyze the data, and how to perform the analysis. In this paper a test bed is discussed to highlight advantages of distributed smart grid architecture by comparing central and local processing of data. Furthermore, it discusses the advantages of local processing of sensors' generated data to manage big data and introduces machine learning algorithms for data processing. In addition to that, we present results for our test bed that prototypes distributed smart grid architecture. Finally, it concludes with the discussion of our results and future up-gradation of power system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207