Israël: een late volksplanting. Een kritisch commentaar bij J.E. Ellemers' Israël-studie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An evaluation of the book by J. E. Ellemers, Van idee tot moderne staat: een studie over het ontstaan van de Israelische maatschappij en de veranderingen daarin (From Idea to Modern State: A Study of the Creation of Israeli Society and Its Transformations, Meppel: Boom and Son, 1967). This is an excellent study which suffers, however, from some serious defects. In spite of the suggestion of the title of his book, Ellemers has concentrated unduly on the early part of his study: the transition from the iy shuv (the Jewish community of Palestine) to the state of Israel. While he indicates some 'total' or even 'totalitarian' elements of Israeli nationalism and 'militarism,' he does not fully do them justice. Also, he fails to place Israel among the latecomers to nation-state building, with the US, the Union of South Africa, Germany, Canada, etc; this makes it difficult for him to do justice to foreign criticisms of Israel. I. Langnas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".