Safepork2015 Proceedings Book: Epidemiology and control of hazards in pork production chain – SAFEPORK One health approach under a concept of farm to fork
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Control strategies to mitigate foodborn pathogens 01.Bactericidal efficiency of UV-active TiO 2 thin films on adhesion and viability of food-borne bacteria 02.Seasonal ability of biofilm formation of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from slaughterhouses in Quebec 03.Impact of the slaughter process on the pork carcasses contamination by Yersinia entrocolitica 04.Biofilm formation by Salmonella enterica strains isolated from feed mills 05.Effect of protective cultures and different modified atmosphere packaging on Listeria innocua growth and on sensory properties in sliced cured-smoked pork loin 06.Is competitive exclusion a valuable alternative for classical cleaning and disinfection of pig-growing units?07.Evaluating the effectiveness of a sodium butyrate feed additive for the control of Salmonella carriage in finishing pigs.Diagnosis and detection of swine zoonotic diseases and pork hazards 08.In the slaughterhouse, how can the first carcasses be more contaminated with Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli than the last ones?09.Salmonella sp. in pigs' skin, external and internal carcass surface at slaughterhouse 10.Detection of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in swine herds in Québec, Canada 11.Comparison of different samples for the detection of MRSA in pigs 12. Genetic diversity of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from pork products 13.Project PathoPig -A practical approach to strengthen post mortem analyses and early detection of pig diseases and zoonoses 14.Streptococcus suis in German pig holdings -conventional and molecular detection 15.Seroprevalence of Salmonella sp. on sixteen small one-site pig farms in Slovenia 16.Toxoplasma gondii: serological study in pigs slaughtered in Portugal 17.Detection of hepatitis e virus (HEV) antibiodies in swine herds in Québec, Canada Meat inspection, quality, hygiene, safety and preservation 18.The usability of the food chain information for visual meat inspection of pigs 19.Zinc content in liver and kidney of piglets slaughtered in Portugal 20.Economic impact of hepatic rejections caused by Ascaris suum in swine during post mortem inspection at slaughterhouse 21.Relationship between pig carcass tail lesions and lung lesions Safepork 2015 Conference Epidemiology and control of hazards in pork production chain -SAFEPORK One health approach under a concept of farm to fork 11 10 22. New EU Regulations on pork labelling and their potential for improving a holistic food policy approach 279 23.The Herd Health and Welfare Index as a benchmarking tool for antimicrobial resistance 283 24.Is meat inspection suitable for the surveillance of animal health (AH) in the pig sector? 287Epidemiology of infection / control and mitigation option of foodborne pathogens and zoonotic diseases in the pork production chain.25.Serological and molecular investigation for brucellosis in swine in selected districts of Uganda 293 26.Salmonella on Belgian breeding and rearing farms.295 27.Case-control study to detect protective factors on pig farms with low Salmonella prevalence.297 28.MRSA on belgian mixed species farms 303 29.A molecular Listeria monocytogenes database to centralize and share typing data from strains isolated from the pork sector in France 305 30.First Salmonella spp.prevalence study in pigs and pork products from the province of Córdoba, Argentine 307 31.Characterization of Salmonella enterica serovars Tyhimurium and 4,5,[12]:i:-isolated from pigs and pig environmental-related sources in the NE of Spain 311 32.Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes related to innate immune response against Salmonella in nursery pigs 315 33.Genomic insight to understand the persistence of Listeria monocytogenes strains in processing environments of pork products 319 34.Salmonella contamination of pig farm environment, Poland, 2014 323 35.Epidemiology and control of Salmonella in the pork production chain: the approach in a high prevalence country (Spain).325 Antimicrobials in swine production, antimicrobial resistance, alternative strategies to antimicrobial use 36.Effects of the additives growth promoters on intestinal histology, ammonia, volatile fatty acids and ph of weanling pigs challenged with E.coli K88+ 329 37. Effects of the additives growth promoters on performance, diarrhea incidence and relative weight of organs of weanling pigs challenged with E.coli K88 + 331 38.Antimicrobial susceptibility of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae isolated in Italy from 2005 to 2013.333 39.Associations between vaccination and antimicrobial consumption in Danish pig herds, 2013 339 40.Evolution of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates from pigs in Belgium 345 41.Antimicrobial resistance in Portuguese swine production -2013 and 2014 Laboratory data 347 42.Reduction of antibiotic use after implementation of Ingelvac® PRRS MLV piglet vaccination in a Belgian wean to finish farm 353 43.Vaccination against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae as an alternative strategy to antimicrobial use in Danish pig herds.357 44.Impacts of colistin sulfate on fecal Escherichia coli resistance and on growth performance of piglets in a post-weaning diarrhea model 361 45.Low prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus but high prevalence of multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs in the usa 367 46.Antimicrobial resistance of commensal E. coli from the pork food chain in Germany.371 47.Use of beta agonists in feeding stuff in Portugal: an overview 373 Risk assessment and risk communication of foodborne pathogens 48.Risk-based approach for food safety applied to pork value chain in Vietnam 375 Other topics 49.First report of kobuvirus detection in swine in the Province of Quebec 377 50.Characterisation of the clinical importance of porcine group C rotavirus in a swine nursery production network in Quebec 379 51.The effect of weather on porcine disease conditions using data from the UK voluntary pig health schemes 381 52.Monitoring the quality of sliced pork ham packed in different modified atmospheres during 45 days of storage 383 53.The UK Voluntary Monitoring Schemes for Pig Health and Welfare: working towards improved health status 385 safe
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.095 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".