MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2616226199 · doi:10.21747/16463153/32a2

Mapeamento de fluxos documentais como elemento de identificação arquivística em ambientes empresariais

2016· article· pt· W2616226199 on OpenAlexaff
Danilo André Cinacchi Bueno, Ana Célia Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

VenuePrisma Com · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Science and Libraries
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Identificação Arquivística é um processo de pesquisa intelectual que versa sobre a análise crítica da gênese do documento de arquivo e seu contexto de produção.É a fase preliminar do tratamento documental desenvolvida para fins de planejamento da produção, classificação, avaliação e descrição de documentos, a partir de requisitos padronizados.Apresenta-se o conceito, os objetos, os instrumentos e as finalidades da Identificação Arquivística.Discute a dinâmica do mapeamento de fluxos documentais como elemento de Identificação Arquivística e a relação estabelecida entre a Arquivologia e a Administração, para o entendimento dos processos administrativos e arquivísticos.Como resultados, apresenta-se uma proposta de sistematização de procedimentos e instrumentos necessários para o processo de mapeamento de fluxos documentais a partir da aplicação da metodologia de Identificação Arquivística como subsídio no âmbito do desenvolvimento do programa de gestão de documentos, da VRG Linhas Aéreas S.A. (Grupo GOL).The Archival Identification is a process of intellectual research that regards the critical analysis of the record genesis and its production context.That is the preliminary phase of documental treatment which is developed for the purpose of production, classification, evaluation and description of records through standardized requirements.It is introduced the term, the concept, the objects, the instruments and the purposes of Archival Identification.It discusses the dynamic of documentary flows mapping as an element of Archival Identification and the relationship established between Archivology and Management area, to the comprehension of administrative and achivistic processes.As a result, it is presented the proposal of a systematization of procedures and instruments needed for the process of documentary flows mapping through the applying of Archival Identification methodology in the scope of development records management programs, in VRG Linhas Aéreas S.A. (Group GOL).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrisma Com→Same topicInformation Science and Libraries→French-language works237,207→