MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616300288

Primary Production by Phytoplankton in Lake Simcoe 2010-2011

2013· dissertation· en· W2616300288 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tae‐Yeon Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoplanktonEnvironmental scienceProduction (economics)OceanographyHydrology (agriculture)EcologyGeologyBiologyNutrientGeotechnical engineeringEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Degradation of water quality, introduction of dreissenid mussels (notably <i>Dreissena polymorpha</i>) and depletion of oxygen concentrations in the hypolimnion in Lake Simcoe, Ontario prompted a study of phytoplankton primary production to inform efforts to improve the lake conditions. The characterization of algal production is critical since, as primary producers, their biomass is positively correlated with production at higher trophic levels in pelagic food webs and oxygen levels. This study was conducted from August 2010 to August 2011, including the winter season (Dec-Mar). Temporally, the lake displayed a unimodal pattern with late summer to fall production maxima. For all seasons considered, the pelagic daily areal primary production (P<sub>int</sub>) was lower in the nearshore than offshore, consistent with the nearshore shunt hypothesis that mussels should be able to deplete phytoplankton more effectively in the nearshore. The sensitivity analysis revealed that chl a and the photosynthetic parameter P<sup>B</sup><sub>max</sub> were the most influential variables for explaining such spatial differences. The size distribution of chl a and production varied where both netplankton (>20µm) and nanoplankton (2-20µm) were greatest in fall and picoplankton (<2µm) was highest in summer and early fall. A large chl a peak of nanoplankton was also found in late-winter (Mar) at offshore stations. The seasonal areal primary production (SAPP; May-Oct) and chl a:TP were significantly lower nearshore than offshore, consistent with grazing impacts from the large nearshore dreissenid mussel community. The lake as a whole is quite productive comparable to other large lakes with comparable total P concentrations and dreissenid mussel populations. The latter part of the study showed that the deep chlorophyll layer (DCL) was not as frequent as expected and was detected only 28% of time during late-spring to summer when the lake was thermally stratified (Aug-Sept 2010 and May-Aug 2011). The percent dissolved oxygen (%) did not show any indications of elevated primary production in the DCL although the production estimates suggested that there is a substantial (an average of 55%) amount of primary production occurring below thermocline when a DCL exists. Whether or not the DCL has potential to nourish the benthic filterers (dreissenids) and has ecological significance in the lake remains unclear. Overall, the factors that control phytoplankton primary production in Lake Simcoe seem to operate somewhat differently from other large lakes and further investigation is needed to elucidate them. The analysis of primary production and biomass has improved knowledge of non-summer production and can provide guidance to site-specific P and oxygen remediation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207