Rola automatycznych narzędzi fiskalnych w stabilizowaniu koniunktury w Polsce w latach 2000-2014
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the study is to examine the character of the influence of automatic fiscal policy instruments on the shaping of internal stabilization of the market economy, where this stabilization involves limitation of the amplitude of business fluctuations, reduction of unemployment and restraint of the dynamics of inflation processes. The paper consists of an introduction, three parts and a conclusion. In the first part, after introductory remarks, hypotheses were formulated as concerns goals and role of automatic fiscal policy instruments in the process of stabilizing market economies. The second part presents evolution of tax fiscal instruments applied in Poland and ponders upon the question whether their influence is automatic or discretionary. The subsequent part contains the results of empirical analyses, showing the impact of automatically applied direct taxes on accomplishment of the goals of internal stabilization of Poland’s economy in the period from quarter I 2000 to quarter III 2014.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it