MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616616203 · doi:10.4000/critiquedart.23468

Krzysztof Wodiczko, Transformative Avant-Garde and Other Writings

2016· article· fr· W2616616203 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christophe Domino

Bibliographic record

VenueCritique d’art · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Politics, and Modernism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformative learningAvant gardeArtAestheticsArt historySociologyPhilosophyPsychoanalysisPsychologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En redistribuant un ensemble de ses écrits en un volume de 350 pages et six chapitres, Krzysztof Wodiczko donne une nouvelle lisibilité à son parcours artistique engagé au tournant des années 1970 et en réaffirme la consistance réflexive. En Pologne (il y est né en 1943, et il y travaille aujourd’hui encore souvent), au Canada puis aux USA où il vit (il enseigne désormais à Harvard, au sein de la Graduate School of Design, après avoir longtemps dirigé le Center for Advanced Visual Studies au ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritique d’artSame topicArt, Politics, and ModernismFrench-language works237,207