MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616833879 · doi:10.7202/1033597ar

L’immersion sensible : une autre façon de transmettre les contenus ?

2015· article· fr· W2616833879 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Alessandra Mariani

Bibliographic record

VenueMuséologies Les cahiers d études supérieures · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesExposition (narrative)ChemistryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour stimuler et favoriser la compréhension, les musées de science ont, depuis une quinzaine d’années, utilisé de façon concluante l’immersion dans l’élaboration de leurs concepts d’exposition. Si ce procédé aide le visiteur dans son interprétation, il complique le travail des concepteurs qui se doivent d’être de plus en plus innovants. En s’appuyant sur l’exposition Sensations urbaines présentée au Centre Canadien d’Architecture en 2006, l’auteur explique comment l’utilisation de stimuli sensoriels permet d’accéder à d’autres contenus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.019
Scholarly communication0.0100.016
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuséologies Les cahiers d études supérieuresSame topicMuseums and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207