A Non-photosynthetic Diatom Reveals Early Steps of Reductive Evolution in Plastids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nonphotosynthetic plastids retain important biological functions and are indispensable for cell viability. However, the detailed processes underlying the loss of plastidal functions other than photosynthesis remain to be fully understood. In this study, we used transcriptomics, subcellular localization, and phylogenetic analyses to characterize the biochemical complexity of the nonphotosynthetic plastids of the apochlorotic diatom Nitzschia sp. NIES-3581. We found that these plastids have lost isopentenyl pyrophosphate biosynthesis and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase-based carbon fixation but have retained various proteins for other metabolic pathways, including amino acid biosynthesis, and a portion of the Calvin-Benson cycle comprised only of glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and the reductive pentose phosphate pathway (rPPP). While most genes for plastid proteins involved in these reactions appear to be phylogenetically related to plastid-targeted proteins found in photosynthetic relatives, we also identified a gene that most likely originated from a cytosolic protein gene. Based on organellar metabolic reconstructions of Nitzschia sp. NIES-3581 and the presence/absence of plastid sugar phosphate transporters, we propose that plastid proteins for glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and rPPP are retained even after the loss of photosynthesis because they feed indispensable substrates to the amino acid biosynthesis pathways of the plastid. Given the correlated retention of the enzymes for plastid glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and rPPP and those for plastid amino acid biosynthesis pathways in distantly related nonphotosynthetic plastids and cyanobacteria, we suggest that this substrate-level link with plastid amino acid biosynthesis is a key constraint against loss of the plastid glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and rPPP proteins in multiple independent lineages of nonphotosynthetic algae/plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".