MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2616929972

Esther Brandeau / Jacques La Fargue: Performing a Reading of an Eighteenth Century Multicrosser

2017· dissertation· en· W2616929972 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
MacLean Hermant, Susan Heather

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerScholarshipDiasporaColonialismGender studiesJudaismIndigenousHistorySociologyLiteratureArtPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How can we research and retell colonial era stories of transgression in service of queer, feminist and decolonial worldmaking? This dissertation argues for deploying multiple genres of research practice to answer this question. The argument is performed through attention to the case of Esther Brandeau / Jacques La Fargue, known as the first, or among the first Jewish people to arrive to Canada. They did so in 1738 as a purportedly female Jewish subject passing as a Christian male, after years working across France as, or often as, male. Doubly outed at or en route to Quebec City and held for a year in New France, they are deported for refusing to convert to Christianity and thereafter disappear from the record. This first major scholarly project centring this eighteenth century figure enters Brandeau / La Fargue into gender crossing histories; complicates the story's place in Canadian culture; offers it as a rich case within Atlantic and Diaspora studies; puts forth a focus on gender in Sephardic Jewish and converso diasporic studies of the colonial period; contributes to scholarship on transgender themes in children's literature; and proposes links between literary Sephardism, queer Indigenous and settler colonial studies. Methodological innovation yields insights at the intersection of historical practice and performance; and new archival evidence is uncovered. The case is established as an antecedent to contemporary discourse about belonging, difference and settler colonialism. An intersectional orientation provides a path for leveraging the story's “queer disruptive potential.” The research contributes to Gender, Queer, Canadian, Atlantic, Jewish and Diaspora Studies, Queer Historiography, Arts Practice as Research and Performance Studies. In Part I, “multicrossing” is elaborated as passing across multiple, simultaneous co-inscribing axes of signification. Through analysis of anachronies of moving between the 18th and 21st centuries, and an analysis of eruptions of the story within Canadian culture, the story's visibility is shown to be conditional and coincident with moments of preoccupation with national belonging. Analysis shows how sociopolitical forces constrain accounts of Brandeau / La Fargue as multicrosser. In Part II, the roles of desire and haunting in historical research are attended to through immersion in archival labour. Narration of this research process and its findings serves to elaborate a “heretic methodology”—a queer historiography where error, doubt, desire and haunting enable production of a texture of the historical subject's living in the absence of conclusive evidence. This reveals how affective connection can be operationalized in historical practice, and how transtemporal touch underpinning queer historiography produces “on the ground.” In Part III, the author's historical reenactments of Brandeau / La Fargue further our understanding of the relationship between body, memory and historical knowledge. The relationship between the performance practice of historical reenactment, and the performative nature of historical research is elaborated. An overarching contribution is “multigenre,” an epistemological intervention featuring dramatically different yet interinanimate research approaches and genres of outcome, distinct from inter- and transdisciplinarity. Multigenre offers one answer to the project's central concern: how to retell colonial era stories as queer, feminist, decolonial gesture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0240.038
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→