MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616934490 · doi:10.1007/s00729-017-0098-7

Achtsamkeit in der Praxis der Traumatherapie

2017· article· de· W2616934490 on OpenAlexaff
Sabine Fabach

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychotherapie Forum · 2017
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldPsychology
TopicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Canadian institutionsMitel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychotherapistHumanitiesMindfulnessPsychologyPsychoanalysisPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Achtsamkeit findet zunehmend Beachtung und Verwendung im psychotherapeutischen Kontext. In diesem Artikel soll anhand der verschiedenen Aspekte von Achtsamkeit gezeigt werden, dass viele etablierte Methoden innerhalb der Traumatherapie bereits auf Prinzipien der Achtsamkeit basieren. Darauf aufbauend wird untersucht, wo individuell adaptierte Anwendung von Achtsamkeitsübungen in der Ressourcen- und Stabilisierungsphase noch gezielter eingesetzt werden können und wie die dabei trainierten Fähigkeiten die Wirksamkeit der Techniken der Konfrontationsphase verbessern oder erst anwendbar machen. Dabei stellt sich auch die Frage, inwieweit Eigenerfahrung mit Meditation für Therapeut_innen zu empfehlen ist, um Achtsamkeit hilfreich in die eigene Praxis integrieren zu können.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1010.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychotherapie ForumSame topicMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFrench-language works237,207