MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616974553

The promises and limitations of using municipal community policing programs to counter violent extremism : Calgary's re-direct as a case study

2016· dissertation· en· W2616974553 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Ottis

Bibliographic record

VenueBIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViolent extremismCommunity policingCriminologyViolent crimePolitical scienceSociologyLawTerrorism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mobilization of Western foreign fighters to join the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has left governments in many countries searching for the most appropriate response. Calgary, Alberta in Western Canada has not been immune to this issue. On top of deploying ‘hard’ approaches (law enforcement and intelligence), Calgary has also embraced the ‘softer’ measures of early intervention and radicalization prevention. The latter category of programs is often labelled ‘countering violent extremism’ (CVE). This thesis examines one such CVE program – ReDirect – launched in September 2015 by the Calgary Police Service. ReDirect was chosen as a case study because it is the first dedicated municipal level, community policing, radicalization prevention program in Canada. The objective of this research project is to fill the gap in literature on Canadian municipal-level CVE programming. The study’s findings are largely based on fourteen interviews with people with in-depth knowledge of the program, which were conducted primarily during fieldwork in Calgary, Alberta in spring 2016.
\n
\nThe study finds that Canada’s framing of CVE as a national security issue results in an “intervention gap” on the radicalization continuum. Due to a combination of legislative, judicial, operational, strategic and political hurdles, none of the federal agencies working on CVE – the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and Public Safety Canada – are able to intervene in early stages of radicalization. Municipal-level programs such as ReDirect provide one way to fill this critical gap. Calgary Police’s adoption of lessons learned from similar programs, its previous successes in community policing and the community’s buy-in suggest that ReDirect may work in reducing radicalization. However, the program also faces limitations. Given the localized nature of ReDirect, the primary determinant of whether a person can access its services is not their need but their postal code. Applying Nesser’s typology of a terror cell reveals that ReDirect will likely only work on a sub-set of individuals vulnerable to violent extremism. Of the four types suggested by Nesser (entrepreneurs, protégés, misfits and drifters), ReDirect would only succeed with the latter two. While ReDirect is the first program of its kind in Canada, its framework may not serve as an appropriate model for other jurisdictions to follow. ReDirect’s signature feature – the central role of police as a convenor of government and civil society groups – works in Calgary because of several unique characteristics and may not necessarily prove suitable for other municipalities looking to create a similar program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway))Same topicTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceFrench-language works237,207