MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616989782 · doi:10.3109/10428194.2010.532893

Mantle cell lymphoma: report of the 2010 Mantle Cell Lymphoma Consortium Workshop

2010· review· en· W2616989782 on OpenAlexaff
Michael E. Williams, Joseph M. Connors, Martin Dreyling, Randy D. Gascoyne, Brad S. Kahl, John P. Leonard, Oliver W. Press, Wyndham H. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueLeukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
FundersPenn State Hershey Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of RochesterMoffitt Cancer CenterUniversity of VirginiaLymphoma Research Foundation
KeywordsMantle cell lymphomaCyclin D1LymphomaMedicineCancer researchEpigeneticsBioinformaticsBiologyCell cycleImmunologyInternal medicineCancerGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma typically characterized by cyclin D1 overexpression as result of the t(11;14) translocation. MCL is biologically and clinically heterogeneous and frequently involves extranodal dissemination. Although MCL is incurable with current therapies, with the exception of allogeneic stem cell transplant, recent advances are improving long-term outcomes in MCL. Intensive research has continued to focus on elucidating biological mechanisms of MCL, identifying new molecular targets, and optimizing existing therapies. Most recently, researchers have begun focusing on new areas such as epigenetics and microRNAs and their potential applications to MCL therapy. Advances across a broad spectrum of MCL research were presented at a recent MCL Workshop. This report provides an overview of the scientific highlights from the meeting and a framework for future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLeukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphomaSame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207