MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2616994137 · doi:10.5377/encuentro.v0i79.3645

¿Ciencias sociales para qué y para quién?

2008· article· es· W2616994137 on OpenAlex
Andrés Pérez Baltodano

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEncuentro · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El desarrollo de la teoría social latinoamericana ha mostrado una marcada tendencia a imitar el pensamiento de Europa y los Estados Unidos. Durante el siglo XVIII, las ideas de la Ilustración encendieron la imaginación de los criollos y les proporcionaron una base teórica para legitimar sus aspiraciones soberanas. El positivismo fue utilizado por las elites de la región en el siglo XIX como una consigna para lograr "el orden y el progreso" o, más bien, el orden sin progreso que les interesaba. En el siglo XX, la democracia liberal se esgrimió como un modelo normativo y, con frecuencia, como un disfraz para ocultar el “país real” que Octavio Paz encuentra sepultado bajo el “país legal” latinoamericano. Tras la Revolución Bolchevique, el Marxismo se transformó, para un importante sector político del continente, en la panacea de todos los males sociales. Más recientemente, el pensamiento neoliberal se ha convertido en la teoría y la ideología con que las élites latinoamericanas pretenden enfrentar los retos del siglo XXI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it