soutien aux familles d’enfants gravement malades, Le: Regards sur des pratiques novatrices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis sa creation en 1999 a Montreal, l’organisme le Phare Enfants et Familles offre du soutien aux familles dont un enfant souffre d’une maladie grave necessitant des soins complexes. Le plus souvent sans espoir de guerison, l’enfant est dans une condition invalidante, il a besoin d’aide pour se deplacer, s’alimenter ou encore respirer. Pour les parents, prendre soin de leur enfant est une tâche exigeante et constante, qui a de nombreuses repercussions sur leur sante physique et mentale, sur leur vie quotidienne, professionnelle et sociale. Les soins et la surveillance de l’enfant obligent souvent les meres a abandonner leur travail. L’organisme offre un service de repit aux parents. Des benevoles rendent visite aux enfants a leur domicile pour leur offrir des activites recreatives quelques heures par semaine. L’enfant peut egalement sejourner pendant plusieurs jours, voire plusieurs semaines a la Maison Andre-Gratton, ou une equipe cherche a rendre son sejour agreable et stimulant, pendant que ses parents prennent du repos. Les activites offertes visent autant a aider les parents a reprendre un controle sur leur vie qu’a permettre aux jeunes de s’epanouir. Le Phare Enfants et Familles participe a l’essor d’un nouveau champ d’intervention : les soins palliatifs pediatriques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".