MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617024762 · doi:10.1353/book35733

soutien aux familles d’enfants gravement malades, Le: Regards sur des pratiques novatrices

2014· book· fr· W2617024762 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manon Champagne, Suzanne Mongeau, Lyse Lussier

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l'Université du Québec eBooks · 2014
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis sa creation en 1999 a Montreal, l’organisme le Phare Enfants et Familles offre du soutien aux familles dont un enfant souffre d’une maladie grave necessitant des soins complexes. Le plus souvent sans espoir de guerison, l’enfant est dans une condition invalidante, il a besoin d’aide pour se deplacer, s’alimenter ou encore respirer. Pour les parents, prendre soin de leur enfant est une tâche exigeante et constante, qui a de nombreuses repercussions sur leur sante physique et mentale, sur leur vie quotidienne, professionnelle et sociale. Les soins et la surveillance de l’enfant obligent souvent les meres a abandonner leur travail. L’organisme offre un service de repit aux parents. Des benevoles rendent visite aux enfants a leur domicile pour leur offrir des activites recreatives quelques heures par semaine. L’enfant peut egalement sejourner pendant plusieurs jours, voire plusieurs semaines a la Maison Andre-Gratton, ou une equipe cherche a rendre son sejour agreable et stimulant, pendant que ses parents prennent du repos. Les activites offertes visent autant a aider les parents a reprendre un controle sur leur vie qu’a permettre aux jeunes de s’epanouir. Le Phare Enfants et Familles participe a l’essor d’un nouveau champ d’intervention : les soins palliatifs pediatriques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l'Université du Québec eBooksSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207