MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617059645

Not the Whole Story: Challenging the Single Mother Narrative

2016· article· en· W2617059645 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Judith Mintz

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian women's studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicResearch in Social Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeSingle mothersContext (archaeology)Subject (documents)SociologyGender studiesPovertyMedia studiesPsychologyHistoryPolitical scienceLiteratureArtLibrary scienceLawDevelopmental psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NOT THE WHOLE STORY: CHALLENGING THE SINGLE MOTHER NARRATIVE Lea Caragata and Judit Alcade, Eds. Waterloo, on: Wilfrid Laurier Press, 2014 [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Not the Whole Story: Challenging the Single Mother Narrative offers its readers an intensive exploration into the gendered discrimination that affects the lives of lone mothers every day. As a single parent, I resonate with the notion of developing more vocabulary with which to articulate the intersecting factors including race, poverty, age, and ability, that make single mothers' lives so difficult. Started as a longitudinal social research project titled, Mothers: Building Social Inclusion by the book's editors, Lea Caragata and Judit Alcade, Not the Whole Story gives voice to the realities of single mothers whose struggles with education, alcoholism, sexual and domestic violences, and the social assistance system demand our attention. In spite of the women's horrific experiences that this book describes, it offers insight to multiple readers, from academics and policymakers, to students and general public through the hope and growth inherent in its pages. Not the Whole Story opens with a compelling introduction that explains the Lone Mothers project from which the 16 stories in the book developed. With the intent to bring critical examination to the subject position of single mothers in Canada, this five-year sSHRC-funded project, began in 2004 as a collective project with single mothers to challenge public discourse about them. The strongest part of the book is this introduction, which offers a social policy and historical context for the stories (Evans 2007; Little, 1998; Vosko 2002). The introduction also briefly explains the ways in which the methodology informs the structure of the book, and the issues that shape poverty, single motherhood, and social status. The evolution of the single mothers telling their stories is fascinatingly informed by Paulo Friere's Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1970). Concomitant with feminist participatory action research, the Lone Mothers Project gives voice to marginalized women who, through a guided group process, gain insights into their own situations and thus free themselves of self-blame discourse and mobilize for positive social change. Each of the women who participated in the Lone Mothers project had the opportunity to tell their personal stories of sole motherhood. It comes as no surprise that systemic and domestic abuse, inequalities in employability and earnings, the virtually non-existent Canadian child care policy, immigration status, racism, and gender inequality all colour the ways in which sole mothers in Canada must navigate their experiences. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian women's studiesSame topicResearch in Social SciencesFrench-language works237,207