L’art comme remise en scène de la vie quotidienne : traduire le social en esthétique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore, à travers le paradigme de la traduction, la mise en scène des interactions sociales dans Playtime de Jacques Tati (1967), Kontakthof de Pina Bausch (1978-2000-2008) et Reconstitutions d’Édouard Levé (1998-2003). Chacune de ces oeuvres témoigne du désir de traduire le social en esthétique : il s’agit de dire l’ordinaire des jeux de distance et de proximité entre les corps, par le cinéma, la danse ou la photographie. Ce geste de traduction emprunte à la logique de la re-présentation qui réifie le social, mais il ne peut s’y réduire. Car la traduction vise aussi à reconduire, sur la scène de l’art, la dynamique du lien en tant qu’adresse faite à l’autre, au risque de son échec. Penser le geste artistique comme traduction permet d’être sensible au devenir chorégraphique des situations sociales, autant qu’à la socialité qui anime des oeuvres qui nous émeuvent ou nous indiffèrent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".