MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ОСНОВНІ ВИМОГИ ДО СТРУКТУРИ ТИПОВИХ МЕДИЧНИХ ІНФОРМАЦІЙНИХ СИСТЕМ В УПРАВЛІННІ ОХОРОНОЮ ЗДОРОВ'Я

2012· article· en· W2617175945 on OpenAlexaff
О. П. Мінцер, М. В. Банчук, L. Yu. Babintseva, І. А. Yarmenchuk, S. O. Diachenko

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Informatics and Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Energy Training
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Risk analysis (engineering)Quality (philosophy)Work (physics)Health careComputer scienceMedical careProcess managementBusinessManagement scienceMedicineEngineeringNursingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In modern development of health care for providing proper quality of medicare there is a necessity in accumulation and analysis of data during the long period, application of electronic and consulting models. The presented work determines basic principles of construction of the informative systems for optimization of management of health care establishments, first of all, at making decisions. Basic tasks and requirements to the informative systems on regional and local levels are considered. It is proven that typical structures of the medical informative systems must have possibilities of risks monitoring for patients and decisions as to danger identification for managers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Informatics and EngineeringSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207