Temporal Dispersion Correction and Prediction by Using Spectral Mapping
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Time-domain finite difference (FD) modeling for wave propagation has been widely used for illumination studies and advanced imaging techniques such as RTM and FWI in complex geology. Any finite-order approximation of the time and space derivatives using FD methods suffer from some degree of numerical dispersion. The temporal and spatial dispersion are independent of each other. Spatial dispersion can be reduced with higher-order finite difference operators and optimized coefficients. The time derivatives are usually approximated to 2nd order. Thus, FD-based simulations and imaging methods often suffer from numerical temporal dispersion error. In this paper, we show that the numerical temporal dispersion from 2nd-order time FD can be corrected via a trace-by-trace spectral mapping operation. For RTM, this spectral mapping operation is to add the predicted temporal dispersion into each gather before backward propagation. This approach eliminates the temporal dispersion at only small cost. One clear benefit of the temporal dispersion correction is a significant speed up because a larger time step can be used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it