MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617270644 · doi:10.34060/reesmat.v6i7.6

A DESTRUIÇÃO DO SÍTIO ARQUEOLÓGICO “NOVA CIDADE” POR OBRA DO PODER PÚBLICO NA CIDADE DE MANAUS

2015· article· pt· W2617270644 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueREVISTA ESMAT · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo objetiva o exame das repercussões ambientais decorrentes da construção do Projeto Habitacional “Nova Cidade”, em Manaus, Amazonas, erguido sobre um dos maiores sítios arqueológicos da América Latina. Tal circunstância, que tem o condão de conferir-lhe a justa expectativa de ser um cenário capaz de revelar um pouco mais acerca da pré-história do Amazonas, mormente sobre os seus primeiros habitantes, foi ignorada ante a ausência do Estudo Prévio de Impacto Ambiental, bem como das autorizações e licenças pertinentes à obra, o que resultou na determinação de medidas reparadoras e mitigadoras dos danos ambientais causados.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it