MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617270644 · doi:10.34060/reesmat.v6i7.6

A DESTRUIÇÃO DO SÍTIO ARQUEOLÓGICO “NOVA CIDADE” POR OBRA DO PODER PÚBLICO NA CIDADE DE MANAUS

2015· article· pt· W2617270644 on OpenAlexaff
Adriana Oliveira de Azevedo, Marcela Matos Fernandes de Oliveira, Márcio Monteiro

Bibliographic record

VenueREVISTA ESMAT · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo objetiva o exame das repercussões ambientais decorrentes da construção do Projeto Habitacional “Nova Cidade”, em Manaus, Amazonas, erguido sobre um dos maiores sítios arqueológicos da América Latina. Tal circunstância, que tem o condão de conferir-lhe a justa expectativa de ser um cenário capaz de revelar um pouco mais acerca da pré-história do Amazonas, mormente sobre os seus primeiros habitantes, foi ignorada ante a ausência do Estudo Prévio de Impacto Ambiental, bem como das autorizações e licenças pertinentes à obra, o que resultou na determinação de medidas reparadoras e mitigadoras dos danos ambientais causados.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueREVISTA ESMATSame topicUrban Development and Societal IssuesFrench-language works237,207