Movid'12 - Proceedings Of The 4Th Workshop On Mobile Video: Foreword
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using a three-aperture scintillometer system (TASS) to measure irradiance fluctuations along a slant path, it is possible to create a C n2 profile model as a function of altitude up to (and possibly beyond) the maximum altitude of a laser beam along the propagation slant path. This technique was demonstrated recently in June 2011 on a beacon beam transmitted between Hollister Airport in California and Fremont Peak at a slant range of 17 km. Although the primary experiment was to test a hybrid optical RF communication system (FOENEX), the beacon signal at the transmitter was intercepted by the TASS from which weighted path-average values of C n2, inner scale l0, and outer scale L0 were determined. Path-average values were then entered into an algorithm that determines the parameters of the HAP C n2profile model (a variation of the HV profile model). In this paper we report on these recent measurements and how this method of constructing the HAP model can be used over other propagation paths. © 2012 SPIE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.092 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".