MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617288654 · doi:10.1130/ges01453.1

Northern Laurentian provenance for Famennian clastics of the Jasper Basin (Alberta, Canada): A Sm-Nd and U-Pb detrital zircon study

2017· article· en· W2617288654 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tyler E. Hauck, Dinu Pană, S. Andrew DuFrane

Bibliographic record

VenueGeosphere · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Energy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyProvenanceZirconLaurentiaOrdovicianPaleozoicProterozoicDevonianDalradianPaleontologyLate Devonian extinctionSedimentary rockClastic rockGeochronologyGeochemistryStructural basinCarboniferousMetamorphic rockTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the carbonate-dominated Devonian succession of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, sandstones of the Famennian Sassenach Formation represent a sedimentological and isotopic anomaly inferred to be related to western sources uplifted during Antler tectonism. Previously reported evidence for a changing tectonic regime along western Laurentia during deposition of the Sassenach renders this unit an important potential link to shifts in source areas associated with this tectonism. We report the first set of U-Pb detrital zircon ages and new Sm-Nd whole rock data from the Sassenach Formation of the Jasper Basin in the Alberta Rocky Mountain fold-and-thrust belt. The 147Sm/144Nd ratios (0.109–0.122) and εNd values (–9.6 to –10.9) at the time of deposition are within a narrow range that overlaps with published data, confirming a post-Ordovician shift to more positive εNd values along the northern and western Laurentian margin coinciding with the introduction of more juvenile sources associated with Innuitian and Grenville sources. A previously recognized subtle negative shift in εNd values in the Sassenach relative to underlying Frasnian deposits is also confirmed, which suggests a minor contribution from more mature sources, opposite the overall post-Ordovician positive trend. Zircon ages show a wide spread (378–3506 Ma), with three broad age groups separated by a paucity of ages in the 700–900 Ma and 2100–2500 Ma ranges: (1) a narrow Paleozoic to Neoproterozoic group (378–700 Ma), (2) a broad Proterozoic group of scattered ages (900–2100 Ma), and (3) a narrow Archean group (2500–2900 Ma). Paleozoic to Neoproterozoic detrital zircon ages are absent from the western Laurentian record, and thus link the Sassenach Formation to the Arctic realm where terranes with zircons of these ages are well known. Discordance modeling suggests a consistent Pb loss in the Sassenach zircon data set (ca. 390 Ma) that coincides with the first orogenic pulse in Innuitian–Ellesmerian tectonics in the paleo-Arctic realm. Together these data suggest that the bulk of terrigenous sediment in the Jasper Basin was recycled from Ellesmerian foreland strata and subsequently transported southward along the margins of western Laurentia. Sediment transport may have been facilitated by southward-directed, shore-parallel shallow-marine currents initiated by Northern Hemisphere wind patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeosphereSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207