MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617299653 · doi:10.1166/jctn.2016.5669

Modified Ridge Type Estimator in Partially Linear Regression Models and Numerical Comparisons

2016· article· en· W2617299653 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAkaike information criterionBayesian information criterionEstimatorModel selectionSmoothingMathematicsInformation CriteriaApplied mathematicsGeneralizationMonte Carlo methodCross-validationMathematical optimizationComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we introduce a modified ridge type estimator for the vector of parameters in a partially linear model. This estimator is a generalization of the well-known Speckman’s approach and is based on smoothing splines method. Most important in the implementation of this method is the choice of the smoothing parameter. Many Criteria of selecting smoothing parameters such as improved version of Akaike information criterion (AIC c ), generalized cross-validation (GCV), cross-validation (CV), Mallows’ C p criterion, risk estimation using classical pilots (REC) and Bayes information criterion (BIC) are developed in literature. In order to illustrate the ideas in the paper, a real data example and a Monte Carlo simulation study are carried out. Thus, the appropriate selection criteria are provided for a suitable smoothing parameter selection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it