MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617318730 · doi:10.1136/bcr-2017-219973

Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor-induced acute interstitial nephritis

2017· article· en· W2617318730 on OpenAlexaff
Brittany Albrecht, Shelley Giebel, Michelle McCarron, Bhanu Prasad

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Case Reports · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants
Canadian institutionsSaskTel (Canada)Regina Qu'Appelle Health RegionRegina General HospitalUniversity of ReginaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCyclooxygenaseNephritisIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 64-year-old female patient presented to the emergency department with a 3-week history of persistent nausea and vomiting. Her serum creatine prior to admission was 118 µmol/L and on presentation was elevated to 420 µmol/L. On clinical history, she indicated that 3 weeks prior, she had been initiated on a cyclooygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, celecoxib, for her osteoarthritis of her knees. Renal biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN). Celecoxib was discontinued and the patient's renal function improved to a discharge creatine of 205-220 µmol/L. Nine months later, her creatine had decreased to 195 µmol/L and she was initiated on tapering doses of prednisone therapy for 4 months, after which time her creatine had improved further to 143 µmol/L. She was later transitioned to mycophenolatemofetil for 9 months and her creatine improved to 110 µmol/L. This report provides further evidence that COX-2 inhibitors are associated with AIN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Case ReportsSame topicNephrotoxicity and Medicinal PlantsFrench-language works237,207