Les sciences humaines à l'école primaire québécoise: Regards croisés sur un domaine de recherche et d'intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A la croisee de travaux de recherche en didactique et de la reflexion critique d’acteurs scolaires, cet ouvrage offre des regards varies sur la mise en œuvre d’un programme d’etudes juge important pour la formation intellectuelle, sociale et culturelle des jeunes, celui de l’univers social. Alors que des chercheurs se penchent sur l’apprentissage et l’enseignement de l’histoire et de la geographie, de meme que sur les ressources disponibles et sur la formation initiale et continue, des acteurs du milieu scolaire traitent de considerations pratiques relatives a l’intervention educative. Enfin, trois chercheurs chevronnes du Quebec, du Canada anglais et de l’Europe commentent differentes contributions reunies dans l’ouvrage et les situent dans un horizon plus vaste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".