MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617500919 · doi:10.1145/3033701.3033744

Text input in Smartwatches Based Gestures Using Geometric Shape

2016· article· en· W2617500919 on OpenAlexaff
Thamer Horbylon Nascimento, Fabrízzio Alphonsus A. M. N. Soares, Cristiane B. R. Ferreira, Leandro Luís Galdino de Oliveira, Anderson S. Soares, Pourang Irani, Marcos A. Vieria

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestureComputer scienceSmartwatchAlphabetClassifier (UML)Naive Bayes classifierGesture recognitionArtificial intelligenceComputer visionSpeech recognitionNatural language processingWearable computerSupport vector machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a method for text input based on gestures to be used in smartwatches using geometric shapes. To make the recognition of gestures, we used the incremental recognition algorithm gestures. a template with straight curves were developed using the reduced equation of the circle. Using this template, thirty users have entered all the letters of the alphabet three times each in three groups totaling ninety inserts for each letter. Gestures entered by users have been used to train a Naive Bayes classifier that calculates the probability of insertion for each letter to from the user-entered gestures. During the development work was also carried out a study of the most frequent letters of the Portuguese language. Another partial result of the project is a prototype in which the user enters all the letters of the alphabet using the template gestures. By the time the user enters a gesture prototype automatically suggests the most frequent letters using the Naïve Bayes classifier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHand Gesture Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207